Issue-​Framing: The Upshot of the Appeal

On 24 November 2009, in Appellate Advocacy, by Peter Smythe

In his book, Gar­ner on Lan­guage and Wri­ting, Bryan Gar­ner wri­tes of the impor­tance of issue-​framing. He quo­tes Karl Lle­wellyn, the for­mer dean of Har­vard: [T]he first art is the fra­ming of the issue so that if your fra­ming is accep­ted, the case comes out your way. Got that? Second, you have to cap­ture the issue, […]

 

An Appellate Rewrite

On 24 November 2009, in Appellate Advocacy, by Peter Smythe

The large part of an appe­llate lawyer’s prac­tice con­sists of wri­ting. And one way to improve one’s wri­ting is rea­ding. Thus I read lots of briefs writ­ten by the all-​so-​famous law­yers in town in order to improve my own wri­ting and com­mu­ni­ca­tion skills. Frankly, since I star­ted this prac­tice, it’s been a lot of hit-​and-​miss. […]

Tagged with:  

Oral Argument: The Paradox of Simplicity

On 23 November 2009, in Appellate Advocacy, by Peter Smythe

Sim­ple expres­sion rarely reflects sim­ple thin­king. Usually the reverse is true: Those who can explain a con­cept simply usually unders­tand it tho­roughly, while those with imper­fect unders­tan­ding stum­ble around in windy, tur­gid gene­ra­li­ties. And sim­pli­city has its own rewards: When the text makes it easy for a judge to appre­ciate a dif­fi­cult pro­po­si­tion, he will […]

Tagged with:  
Page 1 of 612345...Last »